| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
See https://git.gluster.org/gluster-swift.git for the new location of
the Gluster-Swift code.
With this patch, no OpenStack Swift related RPMs are constructed.
This patch also removes the unused code that references the
user.ufo-test xattr key in the DHT translator.
Change-Id: I2da32642cbd777737a41c5f9f6d33f059c85a2c1
BUG: 961902 (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961902)
Signed-off-by: Peter Portante <peter.portante@redhat.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/4970
Reviewed-by: Kaleb KEITHLEY <kkeithle@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Luis Pabon <lpabon@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Gluster Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.com>
Reviewed-by: Anand Avati <avati@redhat.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Change-Id: Id22c968aefd82c4b62445b3ecc93cbabc2b35ffc
BUG: 887301
Signed-off-by: Mohammed Junaid <junaid@redhat.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/4394
Reviewed-by: Kaleb KEITHLEY <kkeithle@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Portante <pportant@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Gluster Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
A file name '.<FILENAME>.<RANDOM>' will hash to the same GlusterFS node
as a file named '<FILENAME>', thus avoiding creation/deletion of linkfiles on a rename.
This is part of the work needed to address BZ 876660
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876660).
Change-Id: I6f18c14b8eaa7a35c96f7e455ef3a19bee7dbde5
BUG: 876660
Signed-off-by: Mohammed Junaid <junaid@redhat.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/4325
Reviewed-by: Kaleb KEITHLEY <kkeithle@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Portante <pportant@redhat.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Apply the upstream DiskFile refactoring in ahead of its use to easiliy apply
the temp file optimization.
Change-Id: I2708733eed3d87759c70eb3d9e6cd74ef91d0c7b
BUG: 876660
Signed-off-by: Peter Portante <peter.portante@redhat.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/4288
Tested-by: Gluster Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.com>
Reviewed-by: Mohammed Junaid <junaid@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vijay Bellur <vbellur@redhat.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Here are a set of cleanups for things noticed while working on the
unit test coverage:
* Remove unused constants, adding a constant for default disk chunk
size
* Document missing logger parameter from constructor
* Add iter_hook paramater to constructor in anticipation of 1.7.4
support
* Add back meta_file field even though it is not used in our version
of the constructor for paranoid compatibility
* Remove is_valid field as it is not referenced anywhere, and it is
not a field of the super class
* Rename fields only used internally by DiskFile with leading
underscores
* Convert to using os.path.join() instead of hard coded '/'
references
* Use data_file field where possible
* Assert that put_metadata() will only work when the file exists
* Remove update_object() method since it is identical to
put_metadata() and a direct write will suffice
* Create the directory object only if it does not exist when a
marker directory is requested
Change-Id: If207fed4c0f423e6bd3232e4507f87de877057c4
BUG: 876660
Signed-off-by: Peter Portante <peter.portante@redhat.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/4287
Tested-by: Gluster Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.com>
Reviewed-by: Mohammed Junaid <junaid@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vijay Bellur <vbellur@redhat.com>
|
|
|
If we had this ahead of time, we could have avoided the errors that
were encountered leading to the fix-account-mapping fix (see
http://review.gluster.org/4222).
This represents 100% coverage of the DiskFile module, but the coverage
report says otherwise, unfortunately. That is because the put() method
invokes eventlets during the test run, and coverage is not able to
accurately track the coverage lines properly. If one comments out the
"tpool.execute()" line in DiskFile.put() the coverage report then
reports 100% for the DiskFile module.
Additionally, we changed DiskFile.put() in four ways that should not
change its behavior:
1. Comments were added to explain various code paths and mark
potential issues / fixes
2. It no longer returns a boolean value, matching the behavior of
swift.obj.server.DiskFile.put()
3. It no longer logs a message when it detects a directory that
already exists, instead is raises an exception
We believe this is okay because we cannot find a code path that
would lead to his condition. As a result, it makes it easier to
test all the code paths in that routine.
4. It no longer logs a message when create_dir_object() fails, since
create_dir_object() raises an exception on failure only
We also modified create_dir_object() to not return a boolean as a
result of the above behavior.
Note that by implementing these tests up to this point we found three
code paths that would have failed if encountered due to missing
imports. We also made changes to the DiskFile module to make it a bit
easier to test, also eliminating an extra stat system call when
deleting directory objects.
Change-Id: I3286de83c1ec7c5e8d6cab9354e1c4397cee7497
BUG: 870589
Signed-off-by: Peter Portante <peter.portante@redhat.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/4284
Tested-by: Gluster Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.com>
Reviewed-by: Mohammed Junaid <junaid@redhat.com>
|
