summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/tests/bugs/getlk_owner.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorPranith Kumar K <pkarampu@redhat.com>2014-12-31 15:15:53 +0530
committerPranith Kumar Karampuri <pkarampu@redhat.com>2015-01-04 19:51:43 -0800
commitf30af2735cab7475d86665856b433ca409e79ee7 (patch)
tree36dfbfcc147a098de12e52d154d3b27bdcc5a2da /tests/bugs/getlk_owner.c
parent2ddd3b2f2bdd6b2046edb0af1e3685dff866ddf6 (diff)
cluster/afr: serialize inode locks
Problem: Afr winds inodelk calls without any order, so blocking inodelks from two different mounts can lead to dead lock when mount1 gets the lock on brick-1 and blocked on brick-2 where as mount2 gets lock on brick-2 and blocked on brick-1 Fix: Serialize the inodelks whether they are blocking inodelks or non-blocking inodelks. Non-blocking locks also need to be serialized. Otherwise there is a chance that both the mounts which issued same non-blocking inodelk may endup not acquiring the lock on any-brick. Ex: Mount1 and Mount2 request for full length lock on file f1. Mount1 afr may acquire the partial lock on brick-1 and may not acquire the lock on brick-2 because Mount2 already got the lock on brick-2, vice versa. Since both the mounts only got partial locks, afr treats them as failure in gaining the locks and unwinds with EAGAIN errno. Change-Id: Ie6cc3d564638ab3aad586f9a4064d81e42d52aef BUG: 1176008 Signed-off-by: Pranith Kumar K <pkarampu@redhat.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/9372 Reviewed-by: Krutika Dhananjay <kdhananj@redhat.com> Tested-by: Gluster Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.com> Reviewed-by: Raghavendra G <rgowdapp@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'tests/bugs/getlk_owner.c')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions