| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Backport of http://review.gluster.org/11004
When compiled with gcc5, following warnings were displayed
and volume start failed:
changelog-helpers.h:499:1: warning: inline function 'changelog_dispatch_event'
declared but never defined
changelog_dispatch_event (xlator_t *, changelog_priv_t *, changelog_event_t *);
gf-changelog-journal-handler.c:692:17: warning: 'list_add_tail' is static but
used in inline function 'gf_changelog_queue_journal' which is not static
list_add_tail (&entry->list, &jnl_proc->entries);
Fix is to remove the keyword from function prototype and
definitions.
Change-Id: I188b35b7ca087a94d7a48a052b05a6d845e3b74b
BUG: 1226853
Signed-off-by: Anoop C S <achiraya@redhat.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/11030
Tested-by: NetBSD Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.org>
Tested-by: Gluster Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.com>
Reviewed-by: Venky Shankar <vshankar@redhat.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The structure 'rpcsvc_state', which maintains rpc server
state had no separate pointer to track the translator.
It was using the mydata pointer itself. So callers were
forced to send xlator pointer as mydata which is opaque
(void pointer) by function prototype.
'rpcsvc_register_init' is setting svc->mydata with xlator
pointer. 'rpcsvc_register_notify' is overwriting svc->mydata
with mydata pointer. And rpc interprets svc->mydata as
xlator pointer internally. If someone passes non xlator
structure pointer to rpcsvc_register_notify as libgfchangelog
currently does, it might corrupt mydata. So interpreting opaque
mydata as xlator pointer is incorrect as it is caller's choice
to send mydata as any type of data to 'rpcsvc_register_notify'.
Maintaining two different pointers in 'rpcsvc_state' for xlator
and mydata solves the issue.
BUG: 1218381
Change-Id: I4c28937a30845e3f41b6fc7a09036149c816659b
Signed-off-by: Kotresh HR <khiremat@redhat.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/10366
Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/10534
Tested-by: Gluster Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.com>
Tested-by: NetBSD Build System
Reviewed-by: Aravinda VK <avishwan@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vijay Bellur <vbellur@redhat.com>
|
|
|
This patch introduces RPC based communication between the changelog
translator and libgfchangelog. It replaces the old pathetic stream
based interaction that existed earlier (due to time constraints :-/).
Changelog, upon initialization starts a RPC server (rpcsvc) allowing
clients to invoke a probe API as a bootup mechanism to request for
event notifications. During probe, clients can choose an event
filter specifying the type(s) of events they are interested in. As
of now there is no way to change the event notification set once
the probe RPC call is made, but that is easier to implement.
The actual event notifications is done on a separate RPC session.
The client (libgfchangelog) itself starts and RPC server which the
changelog translator "connects back" during probe. Notifications
are dispatched by a bunch of threads from the server (translator)
and the client optionally orders them if ordered notifications
are requried. FOPs fill in their respective event details in a
buffer (rot-buffs to be particular) and a bunch of threads
(consumers) swap the buffers out of roatation and dispatch them
via RPC. To avoid writer starvation, then number of dispatcher
threads is one less than the number of buffer list in rot-buffs.x
libgfchangelog becomes purely callback based -- upon event
notification from the server (and re-ordering them if required)
invoke a callback routine specified by consumer(s).
A major part of the patch is also aimed at providing backward
compatibility for geo-replication, which was one of the main
consumer of the stream based API. Also, this patch does not\
"turn on" event notifications for all fops, just a bunch which
is currently in requirement. Another pain point is that the
server does not filter events before dispatching it to the
clients. That load is taken up by the client itself (although
it's done at the library layer rather than making it hard on
the callback implementor). This needs improvement and care
needs to be taken to not load the server up with expensive
filtering mechanisms.
Change-Id: Ibf60a432b68f2dfa60c6f9add2bcfd37a9c41395
BUG: 1170075
Signed-off-by: Venky Shankar <vshankar@redhat.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/9708
Reviewed-by: Jeff Darcy <jdarcy@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Gluster Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.com>
Reviewed-by: Vijay Bellur <vbellur@redhat.com>
|
