| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
On a tiered volume, snapshot clone fails while trying to
pause tier, as we pass volname(snap) to the brick_op_phase module,
which tries to look for the snap volume amongst regular
volumes, and obviously doesn't find it and fail.
Well as snapshot volumes are read only volume, and will not
have tiering daemon acting upon them, there is really no need
to pause tiereing while taking clone of snapshot volumes. Hence
removing the code to pause and resume tiering during clone create.
Change-Id: I2266aba589a830a13a806c0d8a56fd8855143ccd
BUG: 1279327
Signed-off-by: Avra Sengupta <asengupt@redhat.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/12548
Tested-by: NetBSD Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.org>
Tested-by: Gluster Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.com>
Reviewed-by: Rajesh Joseph <rjoseph@redhat.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
snapshot clone creation fails 'spuriously' on the
regression setup coz the brick rpc connect for snap3
in the testcase, happens way after the snap was created.
So adding a EXPECT_WITHIN $PROCESS_UP_TIMEOUT check(read delay)
to help the cause. But this isn't a 100% guaranteed fix, as on an
even slower machine, even this check will fail followed by the
subsequent failures that this patch is trying to fix in the first place
Change-Id: I2f31558b717fd610111f14e451fe444c09f3f254
BUG: 1278418
Signed-off-by: Avra Sengupta <asengupt@redhat.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/12516
Tested-by: Gluster Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.com>
Reviewed-by: mohammed rafi kc <rkavunga@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vijay Bellur <vbellur@redhat.com>
|
|
|
A snapshot should inherit snap-max-hard-limit from the original
volume while being created and when being restored to, it should
restore the same.
Similarly a clone taken from a snapshot should inherit
snap-max-hard-limit from the snapshot.
Change-Id: If8e90e2ffc10e22086b803ac8e2638a16bcec968
BUG: 1275616
Signed-off-by: Avra Sengupta <asengupt@redhat.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/12437
Tested-by: Gluster Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.com>
Reviewed-by: mohammed rafi kc <rkavunga@redhat.com>
Tested-by: NetBSD Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.org>
Reviewed-by: Rajesh Joseph <rjoseph@redhat.com>
|
