Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
* | glusterd: manage upgrade to current master | Amar Tumballi | 2019-02-04 | 1 | -1/+0 |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | Scenarios tested: * Upgrade the node when there are stripe / tiering and regular type of volumes are present. - All volumes are started fine (as the change was not on brick volfile) - For tier, the functionality may not even work, as changetimerecorder is not present. - 'gluster volume info' properly shows as 'NOT SUPPORTED' for stripe and tier type of volume. * Upgrade in a rolling upgrade scenario, where an old version is able to connect to higher master. - on a normal volume, if the volfile-server was new, the newer client volfiles needed to have utime xlator conditionally. - with this one change, all other changes seem to work fine. Change-Id: Ib2d3b69dafa02b2c695a735b13c1aa70aba07cb8 updates: bz#1635688 Signed-off-by: Amar Tumballi <amarts@redhat.com> | ||||
* | tests: Update tier CLI in .t files | N Balachandran | 2017-10-30 | 1 | -1/+1 |
| | | | | | | | | Update .t tier tests to use the new tier CLI. Change-Id: I0e7f1769071108d8266fc86378c4466bcaf96e7d BUG: 1505253 Signed-off-by: N Balachandran <nbalacha@redhat.com> | ||||
* | snapshot: Fix finding brick mount path logic | Avra Sengupta | 2015-06-05 | 1 | -0/+32 |
Previously while finding brick mount paths of snap volume's bricks, we were taking brick order into consideration. This logic fails when a brick is removed or a tier is added. Hence modifying the logic to look for the first occurence of the word "brick" in the brick path. From there we iterate till we find a '/'. The string till the first '/' after we encounter the word brick is the brick mount path. Change-Id: Ic85983c4e975e701cdfd4e13f8e276ac391a3e49 BUG: 1227646 Signed-off-by: Avra Sengupta <asengupt@redhat.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/11060 Tested-by: Gluster Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.com> Tested-by: NetBSD Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.org> Reviewed-by: Rajesh Joseph <rjoseph@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Krishnan Parthasarathi <kparthas@redhat.com> |