| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Problem:
In the .t, when the only good brick was brought down, writes on the fd were
still succeeding on the bad bricks. The inflight split-brain check was
marking the write as failure but since the write succeeded on all the
bad bricks, afr_txn_nothing_failed() was set to true and we were
unwinding writev with success to DHT and then catching the failure in
post-op in the background.
Fix:
Don't wind the FOP phase if the write_subvol (which is populated with readable
subvols obtained in pre-op cbk) does not have at least 1 good brick which was up
when the transaction started.
Note: This fix is not related to brick muliplexing. I ran the .t
10 times with this fix and brick-mux enabled without any failures.
Change-Id: I915c9c366aa32cd342b1565827ca2d83cb02ae85
updates: bz#1577672
Signed-off-by: Ravishankar N <ravishankar@redhat.com>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
afr relies on pending changelog xattrs to identify source and sinks and the
setting of these xattrs happen in post-op. So if post-op fails, we need to
unwind the write txn with a failure.
Change-Id: I0f019ac03890108324ee7672883d774918b20be1
BUG: 1506140
Signed-off-by: Ravishankar N <ravishankar@redhat.com>
|
|
cyclic order
When the bricks are brought offline and then online in cyclic
order while writes are in progress on a file, thanks to inode
refresh in write txns, AFR will mostly fail the write attempt
when the only good copy is offline. However, there is still a
remote possibility that the file will run into split-brain if
the brick that has the lone good copy goes offline *after* the
inode refresh but *before* the write txn completes (I call it
in-flight split-brain in the patch for ease of reference),
requiring intervention from admin to resolve the split-brain
before the IO can resume normally on the file. To get around this,
the patch does the following things:
i) retains the dirty xattrs on the file
ii) avoids marking the last of the good copies as bad (or accused)
in case it is the one to go down during the course of a write.
iii) fails that particular write with the appropriate errno.
This way, we still have one good copy left despite the split-brain situation
which when it is back online, will be chosen as source to do the heal.
Change-Id: I9ca634b026ac830b172bac076437cc3bf1ae7d8a
BUG: 1363721
Signed-off-by: Krutika Dhananjay <kdhananj@redhat.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/15080
Tested-by: Pranith Kumar Karampuri <pkarampu@redhat.com>
Smoke: Gluster Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.org>
CentOS-regression: Gluster Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.org>
Reviewed-by: Ravishankar N <ravishankar@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@natalenko.name>
NetBSD-regression: NetBSD Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.org>
Reviewed-by: Pranith Kumar Karampuri <pkarampu@redhat.com>
|