| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Problem:
Changelog creates threads even if the changelog is not enabled
Background:
Changelog xlator broadly does two things
1. Journalling - Cosumers are geo-rep and glusterfind
2. Event Notification for registered events like (open, release etc) -
Consumers are bitrot, geo-rep
The existing option "changelog.changelog" controls journalling and
there is no option to control event notification and is enabled by
default. So when bitrot/geo-rep is not enabled on the volume, threads
and resources(rpc and rbuf) related to event notifications consumes
resources and cpu cycle which is unnecessary.
Solution:
The solution is to have two different options as below.
1. changelog-notification : Event notifications
2. changelog : Journalling
This patch introduces the option "changelog-notification" which is
not exposed to user. When either bitrot or changelog (journalling)
is enabled, it internally enbales 'changelog-notification'. But
once the 'changelog-notification' is enabled, it will not be disabled
for the life time of the brick process even after bitrot and changelog
is disabled. As of now, rpc resource cleanup has lot of races and is
difficult to cleanup cleanly. If allowed, it leads to memory leaks
and crashes on enable/disable of bitrot or changelog (journal) in a
loop. Hence to be safer, the event notification is not disabled within
lifetime of process once enabled.
Change-Id: Ifd00286e0966049e8eb9f21567fe407cf11bb02a
Updates: #475
Signed-off-by: Mohit Agrawal <moagrawal@redhat.com>
|
|
|
The need to perform object versioning in the truncate() code path
required an fd to reuse existing versioning infrastructure that's
used by fd based operations (such as writev(), ftruncate(), etc..).
This tempted the use of anonymous fd which was never ever unref()'d
after use resulting in fd and/or memory leak depending on the code
path taken. Versioning resulted in a dangling file descriptor left
open in the filesystem effecting the signing process of a given
object (no release() would be trigerred, hence no signing would be
performed). On the other hand, cases where the object need not be
versioned, the anonymous fd in still ref()'d resulting in memory
leak (NOTE: there's no "dangling" file descriptor in this case).
Change-Id: I29c3d2af9bbc5cd4b8ddf38954080e3c7a44ba61
BUG: 1227996
Signed-off-by: Venky Shankar <vshankar@redhat.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/11077
Tested-by: NetBSD Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.org>
Reviewed-by: Raghavendra Bhat <raghavendra@redhat.com>
|
