| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Right now, if no option is provided, the default port is assumed,
which is 24007. Ideally, for 'glusterfsd' processes, it is better
to not assume there are any ports given, so it can start listening
on any port which is available.
This helps us to cleanup the dependencies on glusterd from glusterfsd
at the moment. No changes would be done to glusterd code, but making
the right defaults helps to make glusterfsd more independent process
later.
NOTE: This patch is a reduced version of below set of patches:
* https://review.gluster.org/14613/ &
* https://review.gluster.org/14670/ &
* https://review.gluster.org/14671/
Credits: Prasanna Kumar Kalever <pkalever@redhat.com>
updates: bz#1343926
Change-Id: Ib874e10505e7366dc56ba754458252b67052e653
Signed-off-by: Amar Tumballi <amarts@redhat.com>
|
|
|
Earlier glusterfs never had an assumption someone would start it with
right arguments, and brick processes would be spawned by a management
layer. It just assume the role based on the volfile. Other than
volfile, no other arguments should be technically mandatory for
working of glusterfs. With this patch, that assumption holds true.
Updates: github issue # 352
A note on why this particular issue for this basic sanity?
As per the design of thin-arbiter/tie-breaker, it can be started
independently on any machine, without need of glusterd. So, similar
to 'glusterd', we should be able to spawn a process with any translator
without options/volume id etc.
fixes: bz#1569399
Change-Id: I5c0650fe0bfde35ad94ccba60e63f6cdcd1ae5ff
Signed-off-by: Amar Tumballi <amarts@redhat.com>
|
