| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
2 domain locking + xattrop for write-txn failures:
--------------------------------------------------
- A post-op wound on TA takes AFR_TA_DOM_NOTIFY range lock and
AFR_TA_DOM_MODIFY full lock, does xattrop on TA and releases
AFR_TA_DOM_MODIFY lock and stores in-memory which brick is bad.
- All further write txn failures are handled based on this in-memory
value without querying the TA.
- When shd heals the files, it does so by requesting full lock on
AFR_TA_DOM_NOTIFY domain. Client uses this as a cue (via upcall),
releases AFR_TA_DOM_NOTIFY range lock and invalidates its in-memory
notion of which brick is bad. The next write txn failure is wound on TA
to again update the in-memory state.
- Any incomplete write txns before the AFR_TA_DOM_NOTIFY upcall release
request is got is completed before the lock is released.
- Any write txns got after the release request are maintained in a ta_waitq.
- After the release is complete, the ta_waitq elements are spliced to a
separate queue which is then processed one by one.
- For fops that come in parallel when the in-memory bad brick is still
unknown, only one is wound to TA on wire. The other ones are maintained
in a ta_onwireq which is then processed after we get the response from
TA.
Change-Id: I32c7b61a61776663601ab0040e2f0767eca1fd64
updates: bz#1579788
Signed-off-by: Ravishankar N <ravishankar@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ashish Pandey <aspandey@redhat.com>
|
