| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
libglusterfs devel package headers are referenced in code using
include semantics for a program, this while it works can be better
especially when dealing with out of tree xlator builds or in
general out of tree devel package usage.
Towards this, the following changes are done,
- moved all devel headers under a glusterfs directory
- Included these headers using system header notation <> in all
code outside of libglusterfs
- Included these headers using own program notation "" within
libglusterfs
This change although big, is just moving around the headers and
making it correct when including these headers from other sources.
This helps us correctly include libglusterfs includes without
namespace conflicts.
Change-Id: Id2a98854e671a7ee5d73be44da5ba1a74252423b
Updates: bz#1193929
Signed-off-by: ShyamsundarR <srangana@redhat.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Change-Id: Ia84cc24c8924e6d22d02ac15f611c10e26db99b4
Signed-off-by: Nigel Babu <nigelb@redhat.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This patch adds support for multiple brick translator stacks running
in a single brick server process. This reduces our per-brick memory usage by
approximately 3x, and our appetite for TCP ports even more. It also creates
potential to avoid process/thread thrashing, and to improve QoS by scheduling
more carefully across the bricks, but realizing that potential will require
further work.
Multiplexing is controlled by the "cluster.brick-multiplex" global option. By
default it's off, and bricks are started in separate processes as before. If
multiplexing is enabled, then *compatible* bricks (mostly those with the same
transport options) will be started in the same process.
Change-Id: I45059454e51d6f4cbb29a4953359c09a408695cb
BUG: 1385758
Signed-off-by: Jeff Darcy <jdarcy@redhat.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.gluster.org/14763
Smoke: Gluster Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.org>
NetBSD-regression: NetBSD Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.org>
CentOS-regression: Gluster Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.org>
Reviewed-by: Vijay Bellur <vbellur@redhat.com>
|
|
|
Using spinlocks on a single-core system makes usually no meaning,
since as long as the spinlock polling is blocking the only available
CPU core, no other thread can run and since no other thread can run,
the lock won't be unlocked until its time quantum expires and it gets
de-scheduled. In other words, a spinlock wastes CPU time on those
systems for no real benefit. If the thread was put to sleep instead,
another thread could have ran at once, possibly unlocking the lock and
then allowing the first thread to continue processing, once it woke up
again.
Change-Id: I0ffc14e26c2e150b564bcb682a576859ab1d1872
BUG: 1306807
Signed-off-by: Prasanna Kumar Kalever <prasanna.kalever@redhat.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/13432
Smoke: Gluster Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.com>
NetBSD-regression: NetBSD Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.org>
CentOS-regression: Gluster Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Darcy <jdarcy@redhat.com>
|
