| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fixes a failure to compile glusterfs with glibc 2.25 (on Gentoo and other systems)
Making all in src
CC libglusterfs_la-dict.lo
In file included from iatt.h:16:0,
from common-utils.h:44,
from dict.c:20:
/usr/include/sys/sysmacros.h:57:45: error: attempt to use poisoned "system"
directly. If you did not intend to use a system-defined macro\n\
^
make[4]: *** [Makefile:959: libglusterfs_la-dict.lo] Error 1
Fixes: bz#1494654
Change-Id: I09b910b5772f52e853f87d81f3923eed9a90f7a1
Signed-off-by: Amar Tumballi <amarts@redhat.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There are many include statements that are not needed.
A previous more ambitious attempt failed because of *BSD plafrom
(see https://review.gluster.org/#/c/glusterfs/+/21929/ )
Now trying a more conservative reduction.
It does not solve all circular deps that we have, but it
does reduce some of them. There is just too much to handle
reasonably (dht-common.h includes dht-lock.h which includes
dht-common.h ...), but it does reduce the overall number of lines
of include we need to look at in the future to understand and fix
the mess later one.
Change-Id: I550cd001bdefb8be0fe67632f783c0ef6bee3f9f
updates: bz#1193929
Signed-off-by: Yaniv Kaul <ykaul@redhat.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
* libglusterfs changes to add new fop
* Fuse changes:
- Changes in fuse bridge xlator to receive and send responses
* posix changes to perform the op on the backend filesystem
* protocol and rpc changes for sending and receiving the fop
* gfapi changes for performing the fop
* tools: glfs-copy-file-range tool for testing copy_file_range fop
- Although, copy_file_range support has been added to the upstream
fuse kernel module, no release has been made yet of a kernel
which contains the support. It is expected to come in the
upcoming release of linux-4.20
So, as of now, executing copy_file_range fop on a fused based
filesystem results in fuse kernel module sending read on the
source fd and write on the destination fd.
Therefore a small gfapi based tool has been written to be able
test the copy_file_range fop. This tool is similar (in functionality)
to the example program given in copy_file_range man page.
So, running regular copy_file_range on a fuse mount point and
running gfapi based glfs-copy-file-range tool gives some idea about
how fast, the copy_file_range (or reflink) can be.
On the local machine this was the result obtained.
mount -t glusterfs workstation:new /mnt/glusterfs
[root@workstation ~]# cd /mnt/glusterfs/
[root@workstation glusterfs]# ls
file
[root@workstation glusterfs]# cd
[root@workstation ~]# time /tmp/a.out /mnt/glusterfs/file /mnt/glusterfs/new
real 0m6.495s
user 0m0.000s
sys 0m1.439s
[root@workstation ~]# time glfs-copy-file-range $(hostname) new /tmp/glfs.log /file /rrr
OPEN_SRC: opening /file is success
OPEN_DST: opening /rrr is success
FSTAT_SRC: fstat on /rrr is success
copy_file_range successful
real 0m0.309s
user 0m0.039s
sys 0m0.017s
This tool needs following arguments
1) hostname
2) volume name
3) log file path
4) source file path (relative to the gluster volume root)
5) destination file path (relative to the gluster volume root)
"glfs-copy-file-range <hostname> <volume> <log file path> <source> <destination>"
- Added a testcase as well to run glfs-copy-file-range tool
* io-stats changes to capture the fop for profiling
* NOTE:
- Added conditional check to see whether the copy_file_range syscall
is available or not. If not, then return ENOSYS.
- Added conditional check for kernel minor version in fuse_kernel.h
and fuse-bridge while referring to copy_file_range. And the kernel
minor version is kept as it is. i.e. 24. Increment it in future
when there is a kernel release which contains the support for
copy_file_range fop in fuse kernel module.
* The document which contains a writeup on this enhancement can be found at
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BSILbXr_knynNwxSyyu503JoTz5QFM_4suNIh2WwrSc/edit
Change-Id: I280069c814dd21ce6ec3be00a884fc24ab692367
updates: #536
Signed-off-by: Raghavendra Bhat <raghavendra@redhat.com>
|
|
|
libglusterfs devel package headers are referenced in code using
include semantics for a program, this while it works can be better
especially when dealing with out of tree xlator builds or in
general out of tree devel package usage.
Towards this, the following changes are done,
- moved all devel headers under a glusterfs directory
- Included these headers using system header notation <> in all
code outside of libglusterfs
- Included these headers using own program notation "" within
libglusterfs
This change although big, is just moving around the headers and
making it correct when including these headers from other sources.
This helps us correctly include libglusterfs includes without
namespace conflicts.
Change-Id: Id2a98854e671a7ee5d73be44da5ba1a74252423b
Updates: bz#1193929
Signed-off-by: ShyamsundarR <srangana@redhat.com>
|
