| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Change-Id: I7087476bbc00cd23ba65ea119bc0fe8a9bff347d
BUG: 1311124
Signed-off-by: Soumya Koduri <skoduri@redhat.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/13498
Reviewed-by: Kaleb KEITHLEY <kkeithle@redhat.com>
Smoke: Gluster Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Darcy <jdarcy@redhat.com>
NetBSD-regression: NetBSD Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.org>
Reviewed-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com>
CentOS-regression: Gluster Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Minimal infrastructure changes for the seek() FOP. This will provide
SEEK_HOLE and SEEK_DATA functionalities.
BUG: 1220173
Change-Id: I4b74fce8b0bad2f45291fd2c2b9e243c4f4a1aa9
Signed-off-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/11480
Smoke: Gluster Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.com>
NetBSD-regression: NetBSD Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.org>
CentOS-regression: Gluster Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.com>
Reviewed-by: Kaleb KEITHLEY <kkeithle@redhat.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Fix a regression caused by commit#If7d59d
Change-Id: Ib2239b9b0e216302e6c89e21288592d35b8d124b
BUG: 1283983
Signed-off-by: Soumya Koduri <skoduri@redhat.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/12708
Tested-by: NetBSD Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.org>
Reviewed-by: jiffin tony Thottan <jthottan@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Gluster Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.com>
Reviewed-by: Kaleb KEITHLEY <kkeithle@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Niels de Vos <ndevos@redhat.com>
|
|
|
Replacing repetitive code like this with code generated from a more
compact "canonical" definition carries several advantages.
* Ease the process of adding new fops (e.g. GF_FOP_IPC).
* Ease the process of making global changes to existing fops (e.g.
adding "xdata").
* Ensure strict consistency between all of the pieces that must be
compatible with each other, through both kinds of changes.
What we have right now is just a start. The above benefits will only
truly be realized when we use the same definitions to generate stubs,
syncops, and perhaps even parts of gfapi or glupy.
This same infrastructure can also be used to reduce code duplication and
potential for error in many of our translators. NSR already uses a
similar technique, using a few hundred lines of templates to generate a
few *thousand* lines of code. The ability to make a global "aspect"
change (e.g. to quorum checking) in one place instead of seventy has
already been demonstrated there.
Other candidates for code generation include the AFR/EC transaction
infrastructure, or stub creation/resumption in io-threads.
Change-Id: If7d59de7a088848b557f5aea00741b4fe19017c1
BUG: 1271325
Signed-off-by: Jeff Darcy <jdarcy@redhat.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/9411
Tested-by: Gluster Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.com>
Tested-by: NetBSD Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.org>
Reviewed-by: Shyamsundar Ranganathan <srangana@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Vijay Bellur <vbellur@redhat.com>
|
