summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/rpc
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorPranith Kumar K <pkarampu@redhat.com>2014-12-31 15:15:53 +0530
committerRaghavendra Bhat <raghavendra@redhat.com>2015-03-25 04:28:33 -0700
commit73835a06e87f685354816fb6c2ca4a9918f5e314 (patch)
treee3406068451349d4c21e9de8a3e4040f3e22958a /rpc
parent6477c13c63e181dec4f034d8d25435026550d93a (diff)
cluster/afr: serialize inode locks
Backport of http://review.gluster.org/9372 Problem: Afr winds inodelk calls without any order, so blocking inodelks from two different mounts can lead to dead lock when mount1 gets the lock on brick-1 and blocked on brick-2 where as mount2 gets lock on brick-2 and blocked on brick-1 Fix: Serialize the inodelks whether they are blocking inodelks or non-blocking inodelks. Non-blocking locks also need to be serialized. Otherwise there is a chance that both the mounts which issued same non-blocking inodelk may endup not acquiring the lock on any-brick. Ex: Mount1 and Mount2 request for full length lock on file f1. Mount1 afr may acquire the partial lock on brick-1 and may not acquire the lock on brick-2 because Mount2 already got the lock on brick-2, vice versa. Since both the mounts only got partial locks, afr treats them as failure in gaining the locks and unwinds with EAGAIN errno. BUG: 1189023 Change-Id: If5dd502d9d25d12425749a8efcf08a1423b29255 Signed-off-by: Pranith Kumar K <pkarampu@redhat.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/9576 Reviewed-by: Krutika Dhananjay <kdhananj@redhat.com> Tested-by: Gluster Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.com> Reviewed-by: Raghavendra Bhat <raghavendra@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'rpc')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions