From 96b179850d618c99d185ce7bfed5fe96e6cde919 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Michael Adam Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 10:16:27 +0200 Subject: glusterd: improve intuitivity of check in glusterd_get_quorum_cluster_counts More intuitive to check for ret == 0 than !ret here... Change-Id: I8177a0bc8f266331187f5f2eeefea8a25cfcb30a Signed-off-by: Michael Adam BUG: 1476410 Reviewed-on: https://review.gluster.org/17912 Smoke: Gluster Build System Reviewed-by: Atin Mukherjee Tested-by: Atin Mukherjee CentOS-regression: Gluster Build System --- xlators/mgmt/glusterd/src/glusterd-server-quorum.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'xlators/mgmt/glusterd') diff --git a/xlators/mgmt/glusterd/src/glusterd-server-quorum.c b/xlators/mgmt/glusterd/src/glusterd-server-quorum.c index a4637f84368..37dec3d2d6b 100644 --- a/xlators/mgmt/glusterd/src/glusterd-server-quorum.c +++ b/xlators/mgmt/glusterd/src/glusterd-server-quorum.c @@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ glusterd_get_quorum_cluster_counts (xlator_t *this, int *active_count, ret = dict_get_str (conf->opts, GLUSTERD_QUORUM_RATIO_KEY, &val); if (ret == 0) { ret = gf_string2percent (val, &quorum_percentage); - if (!ret) + if (ret == 0) ratio = _gf_true; } if (ratio) -- cgit