From 621138ce763eda8270d0a4f6d7209fd50ada8787 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Yaniv Kaul Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2018 17:03:17 +0300 Subject: All: run codespell on the code and fix issues. Please review, it's not always just the comments that were fixed. I've had to revert of course all calls to creat() that were changed to create() ... Only compile-tested! Change-Id: I7d02e82d9766e272a7fd9cc68e51901d69e5aab5 updates: bz#1193929 Signed-off-by: Yaniv Kaul --- xlators/features/marker/src/marker.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'xlators/features/marker/src/marker.c') diff --git a/xlators/features/marker/src/marker.c b/xlators/features/marker/src/marker.c index 659ca890066..522fdfb86d1 100644 --- a/xlators/features/marker/src/marker.c +++ b/xlators/features/marker/src/marker.c @@ -1364,7 +1364,7 @@ marker_rename_unwind (call_frame_t *frame, void *cookie, xlator_t *this, if (local->stub != NULL) { /* Remove contribution node from in-memory even if * remove-xattr has failed as the rename is already performed - * if local->stub is set, which means rename was sucessful + * if local->stub is set, which means rename was successful */ (void) mq_inode_ctx_get (oplocal->loc.inode, this, &ctx); if (ctx) { @@ -1641,7 +1641,7 @@ err: * b) we should subtract from src-parent exactly what we contributed to * src-parent * So, We hold a lock on src-parent to block any parallel transcations on - * src-inode (since thats the one which survives rename). + * src-inode (since that's the one which survives rename). * * If there are any parallel transactions on dst-inode they keep succeeding * till the association of dst-inode with dst-parent is broken because of an -- cgit