From 5979bc3b964adcb8a536dc354e4eca08acaff03e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Amar Tumballi Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 05:56:22 +0000 Subject: protocol/rpc/transport: bring in one more event for 'TRANSPORT-DESTROY' needed because, a RPC disconnect doesn't mean that a RPC transport/listener is dead. With this, the race in server protocol cleaning up the lock table / fd table when some frames are in transit will be handled properly. Signed-off-by: Amar Tumballi Signed-off-by: Vijay Bellur BUG: 1843 () URL: http://bugs.gluster.com/cgi-bin/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=1843 --- rpc/rpc-transport/socket/src/socket.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'rpc/rpc-transport') diff --git a/rpc/rpc-transport/socket/src/socket.c b/rpc/rpc-transport/socket/src/socket.c index ae4bd56a821..40531ad4c2a 100644 --- a/rpc/rpc-transport/socket/src/socket.c +++ b/rpc/rpc-transport/socket/src/socket.c @@ -1736,7 +1736,7 @@ socket_event_handler (int fd, int idx, void *data, if ((ret < 0) || poll_err) { gf_log ("transport", GF_LOG_TRACE, "disconnecting now"); socket_event_poll_err (this); - //rpc_transport_unref (this); + rpc_transport_unref (this); } out: -- cgit