From 5979bc3b964adcb8a536dc354e4eca08acaff03e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Amar Tumballi Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 05:56:22 +0000 Subject: protocol/rpc/transport: bring in one more event for 'TRANSPORT-DESTROY' needed because, a RPC disconnect doesn't mean that a RPC transport/listener is dead. With this, the race in server protocol cleaning up the lock table / fd table when some frames are in transit will be handled properly. Signed-off-by: Amar Tumballi Signed-off-by: Vijay Bellur BUG: 1843 () URL: http://bugs.gluster.com/cgi-bin/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=1843 --- rpc/rpc-lib/src/rpcsvc-common.h | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) (limited to 'rpc/rpc-lib/src/rpcsvc-common.h') diff --git a/rpc/rpc-lib/src/rpcsvc-common.h b/rpc/rpc-lib/src/rpcsvc-common.h index 7e72bc3ae44..442049433a7 100644 --- a/rpc/rpc-lib/src/rpcsvc-common.h +++ b/rpc/rpc-lib/src/rpcsvc-common.h @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ typedef enum { RPCSVC_EVENT_ACCEPT, RPCSVC_EVENT_DISCONNECT, + RPCSVC_EVENT_TRANSPORT_DESTROY, RPCSVC_EVENT_LISTENER_DEAD, } rpcsvc_event_t; -- cgit