From 5979bc3b964adcb8a536dc354e4eca08acaff03e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Amar Tumballi Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 05:56:22 +0000 Subject: protocol/rpc/transport: bring in one more event for 'TRANSPORT-DESTROY' needed because, a RPC disconnect doesn't mean that a RPC transport/listener is dead. With this, the race in server protocol cleaning up the lock table / fd table when some frames are in transit will be handled properly. Signed-off-by: Amar Tumballi Signed-off-by: Vijay Bellur BUG: 1843 () URL: http://bugs.gluster.com/cgi-bin/bugzilla3/show_bug.cgi?id=1843 --- glusterfsd/src/glusterfsd.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'glusterfsd') diff --git a/glusterfsd/src/glusterfsd.c b/glusterfsd/src/glusterfsd.c index eb2f61ba577..4d8eb22fe0c 100644 --- a/glusterfsd/src/glusterfsd.c +++ b/glusterfsd/src/glusterfsd.c @@ -661,7 +661,7 @@ cleanup_and_exit (int signum) glusterfs_mgmt_pmap_signout (ctx); if (ctx->mgmt) - rpc_clnt_destroy (ctx->mgmt); + rpc_clnt_unref (ctx->mgmt); gf_log ("glusterfsd", GF_LOG_NORMAL, "shutting down"); -- cgit