From 9565ac3328dc91bd721a65b6d4e7957929e9ed59 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: AkshataDM Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2014 23:33:38 +0530 Subject: Made spelling changes to 19 files Change-Id: If91cf44578fe0b5176ea01ae5c5962e31606f640 BUG: 1075417 Signed-off-by: AkshataDM Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/7280 Reviewed-by: Varun Shastry Reviewed-by: Anand Avati Tested-by: Anand Avati --- doc/coding-standard.tex | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'doc/coding-standard.tex') diff --git a/doc/coding-standard.tex b/doc/coding-standard.tex index 30d412a918b..80c11041e60 100644 --- a/doc/coding-standard.tex +++ b/doc/coding-standard.tex @@ -321,7 +321,7 @@ This is the recommended template for any fop. In the beginning come the initializations. After that, the `success' control flow should be linear. Any error conditions should cause a \texttt{goto} to a single point, \texttt{out}. At that point, the code should detect the error -that has occured and do appropriate cleanup. +that has occurred and do appropriate cleanup. \begin{verbatim} int32_t -- cgit