| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
There are many include statements that are not needed.
A previous more ambitious attempt failed because of *BSD plafrom
(see https://review.gluster.org/#/c/glusterfs/+/21929/ )
Now trying a more conservative reduction.
It does not solve all circular deps that we have, but it
does reduce some of them. There is just too much to handle
reasonably (dht-common.h includes dht-lock.h which includes
dht-common.h ...), but it does reduce the overall number of lines
of include we need to look at in the future to understand and fix
the mess later one.
Change-Id: I550cd001bdefb8be0fe67632f783c0ef6bee3f9f
updates: bz#1193929
Signed-off-by: Yaniv Kaul <ykaul@redhat.com>
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
libglusterfs devel package headers are referenced in code using
include semantics for a program, this while it works can be better
especially when dealing with out of tree xlator builds or in
general out of tree devel package usage.
Towards this, the following changes are done,
- moved all devel headers under a glusterfs directory
- Included these headers using system header notation <> in all
code outside of libglusterfs
- Included these headers using own program notation "" within
libglusterfs
This change although big, is just moving around the headers and
making it correct when including these headers from other sources.
This helps us correctly include libglusterfs includes without
namespace conflicts.
Change-Id: Id2a98854e671a7ee5d73be44da5ba1a74252423b
Updates: bz#1193929
Signed-off-by: ShyamsundarR <srangana@redhat.com>
|
| |
|
|
| |
Change-Id: I6f5d8140a06f3c1b2d196849299f8d483028d33b
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Currently its passed in dht_blocking_inode(entry)lk, which would be a
global value for all the locks passed in the argument. This would
be a limitation for cases where we want to ignore failures on only few
locks and fail for others.
Change-Id: I02cfbcaafb593ad8140c0e5af725c866b630fb6b
BUG: 1543279
Signed-off-by: Raghavendra G <rgowdapp@redhat.com>
|
|
|
Design doc: https://review.gluster.org/16876
Directory creation is now synchronized with blocking inodelk of the
parent on the hashed subvolume followed by the entrylk on the hashed
subvolume between dht_mkdir, dht_rmdir, dht_rename_dir and lookup
selfheal mkdir.
To maintain internal consistency of directories across all subvols of
dht, we need locks. Specifically we are interested in:
1. Consistency of layout of a directory. Only one writer should modify
the layout at a time. A writer (layout setting during directory heal
as part of lookup) shouldn't modify the layout while there are
readers (all other fops like create, mkdir etc., which consume
layout) and readers shouldn't read the layout while a writer is in
progress. Readers can read the layout simultaneously. Writer takes
a WRITE inodelk on the directory (whose layout is being modified)
across ALL subvols. Reader takes a READ inodelk on the directory
(whose layout is being read) on ANY subvol.
2. Consistency of directory namespace across subvols. The path and
associated gfid should be same on all subvols. A gfid should not be
associated with more than one path on any subvol. All fops that can
change directory names (mkdir, rmdir, renamedir, directory creation
phase in lookup-heal) takes an entrylk on hashed subvol of the
directory.
NOTE1: In point 2 above, since dht takes entrylk on hashed subvol of a
directory, the transaction itself is a consumer of layout on
parent directory. So, the transaction is a reader of parent
layout and does an inodelk on parent directory just like any
other layout reader. So a mkdir (dir/subdir) would:
> Acquire a READ inodelk on "dir" on any subvol.
> Acquire an entrylk (dir, "subdir") on hashed subvol of "subdir".
> creates directory on hashed subvol and possibly on non-hashed subvols.
> UNLOCK (entrylk)
> UNLOCK (inodelk)
NOTE2: mkdir fop while setting the layout of the directory being created
is considered as a reader, but NOT a writer. The reason is for
a fop which can consume the layout of a directory to come either
of the following conditions has to be true:
> mkdir syscall from application has to complete. In this case no
need of synchronization.
> A lookup issued on the directory racing with mkdir has to complete.
Since layout setting by a lookup is considered as a writer, only
one of either mkdir or lookup will set the layout.
Code re-organization:
All the lock related routines are moved to "dht-lock.c" file.
New wrapper function is introduced to take blocking inodelk
followed by entrylk 'dht_protect_namespace'
Updates #191
Change-Id: I01569094dfbe1852de6f586475be79c1ba965a31
Signed-off-by: Kotresh HR <khiremat@redhat.com>
BUG: 1443373
Reviewed-on: https://review.gluster.org/15472
NetBSD-regression: NetBSD Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.org>
CentOS-regression: Gluster Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.org>
Reviewed-by: Raghavendra G <rgowdapp@redhat.com>
Smoke: Gluster Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.org>
|
