summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/xlators/performance/write-behind/src/write-behind.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorRaghavendra G <rgowdapp@redhat.com>2016-01-11 16:17:29 +0530
committerRaghavendra G <rgowdapp@redhat.com>2016-01-13 21:42:13 -0800
commit1b9174d35dc113f97fd5cec811633853cef269f3 (patch)
tree93b58bf113bbdc71bbd0043f05fdd3193f20b3e2 /xlators/performance/write-behind/src/write-behind.c
parent252fe523e2932e83a98f203f71678f391eee6b22 (diff)
performance/write-behind: fix memory corruption
1. while handling short writes, __wb_fulfill_short_write would've freed current request before moving on to next in the list if request is not big enough to accomodate completed number of bytes. So, make sure to save next member before invoking __wb_fulfill_short_write on current request. Also handle the case where request is exactly the size of remaining completed number of bytes. 2. When write request is unwound because there is a conflicting failed liability, make sure its deleted from tempted list. Otherwise there will be two unwinds (one as part handling a failed request in wb_do_winds and another in wb_do_unwinds). Change-Id: Id1b54430796b19b956d24b8d99ab0cdd5140e4f6 BUG: 1297373 Signed-off-by: Raghavendra G <rgowdapp@redhat.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/13213 Tested-by: NetBSD Build System <jenkins@build.gluster.org> Reviewed-by: Raghavendra Talur <rtalur@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'xlators/performance/write-behind/src/write-behind.c')
-rw-r--r--xlators/performance/write-behind/src/write-behind.c54
1 files changed, 45 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/xlators/performance/write-behind/src/write-behind.c b/xlators/performance/write-behind/src/write-behind.c
index c6bc5ef573e..c3c42cd1a4f 100644
--- a/xlators/performance/write-behind/src/write-behind.c
+++ b/xlators/performance/write-behind/src/write-behind.c
@@ -837,7 +837,7 @@ out:
}
int
-__wb_fulfill_short_write (wb_request_t *req, int size)
+__wb_fulfill_short_write (wb_request_t *req, int size, gf_boolean_t *fulfilled)
{
int accounted_size = 0;
@@ -847,6 +847,7 @@ __wb_fulfill_short_write (wb_request_t *req, int size)
if (req->write_size <= size) {
accounted_size = req->write_size;
__wb_fulfill_request (req);
+ *fulfilled = 1;
} else {
accounted_size = size;
__wb_modify_write_request (req, size);
@@ -859,9 +860,10 @@ out:
void
wb_fulfill_short_write (wb_request_t *head, int size)
{
- wb_inode_t *wb_inode = NULL;
- wb_request_t *req = NULL, *tmp = NULL;
- int accounted_size = 0;
+ wb_inode_t *wb_inode = NULL;
+ wb_request_t *req = NULL, *next = NULL;
+ int accounted_size = 0;
+ gf_boolean_t fulfilled = _gf_false;
if (!head)
goto out;
@@ -872,25 +874,48 @@ wb_fulfill_short_write (wb_request_t *head, int size)
LOCK (&wb_inode->lock);
{
- accounted_size = __wb_fulfill_short_write (head, size);
+ /* hold a reference to head so that __wb_fulfill_short_write
+ * won't free it. We need head for a cleaner list traversal as
+ * list_for_each_entry_safe doesn't iterate over "head" member.
+ * So, if we pass "next->winds" as head to list_for_each_entry,
+ * "next" is skipped. For a simpler logic we need to traverse
+ * the list in the order. So, we start traversal from
+ * "head->winds" and hence we want head to be alive.
+ */
+ __wb_request_ref (head);
+
+ next = list_entry (head->winds.next, wb_request_t, winds);
+
+ accounted_size = __wb_fulfill_short_write (head, size,
+ &fulfilled);
size -= accounted_size;
- if (size == 0)
+ if (size == 0) {
+ if (fulfilled)
+ req = next;
+
goto done;
+ }
- list_for_each_entry_safe (req, tmp, &head->winds, winds) {
- accounted_size = __wb_fulfill_short_write (req, size);
+ list_for_each_entry_safe (req, next, &head->winds, winds) {
+ accounted_size = __wb_fulfill_short_write (req, size,
+ &fulfilled);
size -= accounted_size;
- if (size == 0)
+ if (size == 0) {
+ if (fulfilled)
+ req = next;
break;
+ }
}
}
done:
UNLOCK (&wb_inode->lock);
+ __wb_request_unref (head);
+
wb_fulfill_err (req, EIO);
out:
return;
@@ -1314,6 +1339,16 @@ __wb_handle_failed_conflict (wb_request_t *req, wb_request_t *conflict,
list_del_init (&req->todo);
list_add_tail (&req->winds, tasks);
+
+ if (req->ordering.tempted) {
+ /* make sure that it won't be unwound in
+ * wb_do_unwinds too. Otherwise there'll be
+ * a double wind.
+ */
+ list_del_init (&req->lie);
+ __wb_fulfill_request (req);
+ }
+
}
} else {
/* flush and fsync (without conf->resync_after_fsync) act as
@@ -1421,6 +1456,7 @@ wb_do_winds (wb_inode_t *wb_inode, list_head_t *tasks)
call_resume (req->stub);
}
+ req->stub = NULL;
wb_request_unref (req);
}
}