To keep consistency inside transactions started by locking an entry or an inode, this change delays the removal of entries that are currently locked by one or more clients. Once all locks are released, the removal is processed. It has also been improved the detection of stale inodes in the locking code of EC. Fixes: #990 Change-Id: Ic8ba23d9480f80c7f74e7a310bf8a15922320fd5 Signed-off-by: Xavi Hernandez <xhernandez@redhat.com>
found by flock test, without correct ref number of fd, lock will not be correctly released. Fixes: bz#1779089 Change-Id: I3e466b17c852eb219c8778e43af8ad670a8449cc Signed-off-by: l17zhou <cynthia.zhou@nokia-sbell.com>
The fop contains blocked lock may use freed frame info when other unlock fop has unwind the blocked lock. Because the blocked lock is added to block list in inode lock(or other lock), after that, when out of the inode lock, the fop contains the blocked lock should not use it. Change-Id: Icb309a1cc78380dc982b26d50c18d67e4f2c8915 fixes: bz#1737291 Signed-off-by: Kinglong Mee <mijinlong@horiscale.com>
The fop_wind_count can go negative when fencing is enabled on unwind path of the IO leading to hang. Also changed code so that fop_wind_count needs to be maintained only till fencing is enabled on the file. updates: bz#1717824 Change-Id: Icd04b42bc16cd3d50eaa581ee57233910194f480 Signed-off-by: Susant Palai <spalai@redhat.com>
There are many include statements that are not needed. A previous more ambitious attempt failed because of *BSD plafrom (see https://review.gluster.org/#/c/glusterfs/+/21929/ ) Now trying a more conservative reduction. It does not solve all circular deps that we have, but it does reduce some of them. There is just too much to handle reasonably (dht-common.h includes dht-lock.h which includes dht-common.h ...), but it does reduce the overall number of lines of include we need to look at in the future to understand and fix the mess later one. Change-Id: I550cd001bdefb8be0fe67632f783c0ef6bee3f9f updates: bz#1193929 Signed-off-by: Yaniv Kaul <ykaul@redhat.com>
All these checks are done after analyzing clang-scan report produced by the CI job @ https://build.gluster.org/job/clang-scan updates: bz#1622665 Change-Id: I590305af4ceb779be952974b2a36066ffc4865ca Signed-off-by: Amar Tumballi <amarts@redhat.com>
* locks/posix.c: key was not freed in one of the cases. * locks/common.c: lock was being free'd out of context. * nfs/exports: handle case of missing free. * protocol/client: handle case of entry not freed. * storage/posix: handle possible case of double free CID: 1398628, 1400731, 1400732, 1400756, 1124796, 1325526 updates: bz#789278 Change-Id: Ieeaca890288bc4686355f6565f853dc8911344e8 Signed-off-by: Amar Tumballi <amarts@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Sheetal Pamecha <spamecha@redhat.com>
Problem: Sometimes we find that developers forget to assign lk-owner for an inodelk/entrylk/lk before writing code to wind these fops. locks xlator at the moment allows this operation. This leads to multiple threads in the same client being able to get locks on the inode because lk-owner is same and transport is same. So isolation with locks can't be achieved. Fix: Disallow locks with lk-owner zero. fixes bz#1624701 Change-Id: I1aadcfbaaa4d49308f7c819505857e201809b3bc Signed-off-by: Pranith Kumar K <pkarampu@redhat.com>
This patch fixes the following NULL dereferences identified by Coverity: * CID 1398619 * CID 1398621 * CID 1398623 * CID 1398625 * CID 1398626 Change-Id: Id6af0d7cba0bb3346005376bc27180e8476255a4 Updates: bz#789278 Signed-off-by: Xavi Hernandez <xhernandez@redhat.com>
This reverts commit 3883887427a7f2dc458a9773e05f7c8ce8e62301 as it has broken sdfs-sanity.t. Updates: bz#1624701 Change-Id: Icb2b0d6bfcce4d556f1cd0f11695c03ffc138736 Signed-off-by: Atin Mukherjee <amukherj@redhat.com>