Problem: In an arbiter volume configuration SHD will not send any writes onto the arbiter brick even if there is data pending marker for the arbiter brick. If we have a arbiter setup on the geo-rep master and there are data pending markers for the files on arbiter brick, SHD will not mark any data changelog during healing. While syncing the data from master to slave, if the arbiter-brick is considered as ACTIVE, then there is a chance that slave will miss out some data. If the arbiter brick is being newly added or replaced there is a chance of slave missing all the data during sync. Fix: If there is data pending marker for the arbiter brick, send truncate on the arbiter brick during heal, so that it will record truncate as the data transaction in changelog. Change-Id: I3242ba6cea6da495c418ef860d9c3359c5459dec fixes: bz#1687746 Signed-off-by: karthik-us <ksubrahm@redhat.com>
Backport of https://review.gluster.org/#/c/glusterfs/+/21297/ Problem: If parent dir is in split-brain or has dirty xattrs set, and the file has gfid missing on one of the bricks, then name heal won't assign the gfid. Fix: Use the brick we select the gfid from as the 'source'. Note: Problem was found while trying to debug a split-brain issue on Cynthia Zhou's setup. fixes: bz#1655561 Change-Id: Id088d4f0fb017aa35122de426654194e581ed742 Reported-by: Cynthia Zhou <cynthia.zhou@nokia-sbell.com> Signed-off-by: Ravishankar N <ravishankar@redhat.com>
Problem: https://review.gluster.org/#/c/glusterfs/+/21427/ seems to be failing this .t spuriously. On checking one of the failure logs, I see: 22:05:44 Launching heal operation to perform index self heal on volume patchy has been unsuccessful: 22:05:44 Self-heal daemon is not running. Check self-heal daemon log file. 22:05:44 not ok 20 , LINENUM:38 In glusterd log: [2018-10-18 22:05:44.298832] E [MSGID: 106301] [glusterd-syncop.c:1352:gd_stage_op_phase] 0-management: Staging of operation 'Volume Heal' failed on localhost : Self-heal daemon is not running. Check self-heal daemon log file But the tests which preceed this check whether via a statedump if the shd is conected to the bricks, and they have succeeded and even started healing. From glustershd.log: [2018-10-18 22:05:40.975268] I [MSGID: 108026] [afr-self-heal-common.c:1732:afr_log_selfheal] 0-patchy-replicate-0: Completed data selfheal on 3b83d2dd-4cf2-4ea3-a33e-4275be40f440. sources=[0] 1 sinks=2 So the only reason I can see launching heal via cli failing is a race where shd has been spawned but glusterd has not yet updated in-memory that it is up, and hence failing the CLI. Fix: Check for shd up status before launching heal via CLI Change-Id: Ic88abf14ad3d51c89cb438db601fae4df179e8f4 fixes: bz#1641761 Signed-off-by: Ravishankar N <ravishankar@redhat.com> (cherry picked from commit 3dea105556130abd4da0fd3f8f2c523ac52398d1)
Backport of https://review.gluster.org/#/c/glusterfs/+/21380/ Problem: In an arbiter volume, if there is a pending data heal of a file only on arbiter brick, self-heal takes inodelks twice due to a code-bug but unlocks it only once, leaving behind a stale lock on the brick. This causes the next write to the file to hang. Fix: Fix the code-bug to take lock only once. This bug was introduced master with commit eb472d82a083883335bc494b87ea175ac43471ff Thanks to Pranith Kumar K <pkarampu@redhat.com> for finding the RCA. fixes: bz#1637953 Change-Id: I15ad969e10a6a3c4bd255e2948b6be6dcddc61e1 Signed-off-by: Ravishankar N <ravishankar@redhat.com>
Backport of https://review.gluster.org/#/c/glusterfs/+/21135/ Problem: When a directory has dirty xattrs due to failed post-ops or when replace/reset brick is performed, AFR does a conservative merge as expected, but heal-info reports it as split-brain because there are no clear sources. Fix: Modify pending flag to contain information about pending heals and split-brains. For directories, if spit-brain flag is not set,just show them as needing heal and not being in split-brain. Change-Id: I09ef821f6887c87d315ae99e6b1de05103cd9383 fixes: bz#1633634 Signed-off-by: Ravishankar N <ravishankar@redhat.com>
commit 20fa80057eb430fd72b4fa31b9b65598b8ec1265 introduced a regression wherein if a file is present in only 1 brick of replica *and* doesn't have a gfid associated with it, it doesn't get healed upon the next lookup from the client. Fix it. Change-Id: I7d1111dcb45b1b8b8340a7d02558f05df70aa599 fixes: bz#1597117 Signed-off-by: Ravishankar N <ravishankar@redhat.com> (cherry picked from commit eb472d82a083883335bc494b87ea175ac43471ff)
1) snprintf into linkname_expected should happen with PATH_MAX 2) comparison should happen with linkname_actual with complete string linkname_expected fixes bz#1595524 Change-Id: Ic3b3c362dc6c69c046b9a13e031989be47ecff14 Signed-off-by: Pranith Kumar K <pkarampu@redhat.com> (cherry picked from commit 3099d3e6ba81d3e1abf37385b13aabf5837b9c5e)
Problem: In the .t, when the only good brick was brought down, writes on the fd were still succeeding on the bad bricks. The inflight split-brain check was marking the write as failure but since the write succeeded on all the bad bricks, afr_txn_nothing_failed() was set to true and we were unwinding writev with success to DHT and then catching the failure in post-op in the background. Fix: Don't wind the FOP phase if the write_subvol (which is populated with readable subvols obtained in pre-op cbk) does not have at least 1 good brick which was up when the transaction started. Note: This fix is not related to brick muliplexing. I ran the .t 10 times with this fix and brick-mux enabled without any failures. Change-Id: I915c9c366aa32cd342b1565827ca2d83cb02ae85 updates: bz#1581548 Signed-off-by: Ravishankar N <ravishankar@redhat.com> (cherry picked from commit 985a1d15db910e012ddc1dcdc2e333cc28a9968b)
1. If pre-op fails on all bricks,set lock->release to true in afr_handle_lock_acquire_failure so that the GF_ASSERT in afr_unlock() does not crash. 2. Added a missing 'return' after handling pre-op failure in afr_transaction_perform_fop(), fixing a use-after-free issue. Change-Id: If0627a9124cb5d6405037cab3f17f8325eed2d83 fixes: bz#1561129 Signed-off-by: Ravishankar N <ravishankar@redhat.com>
Problem: 1) Afr's eager-lock only works for data transactions. 2) When there are conflicting writes, write with conflicting region initiates unlock of eager-lock leading to extra pre-ops and post-ops on the file. When eager-lock goes off, it leads to extra fsyncs for random-write workload in afr. Solution (that is modeled after EC): In EC, when there is a conflicting write, it waits for the current write to complete before it winds the conflicted write. This leads to better utilization of network and disk, because we will not be doing extra xattrops and FSYNCs and inodelk/unlock. Moved fd based counters to inode based counters. I tried to model the solution based on EC's locking, but it is not similar to AFR because we had to keep backward compatibility. Lifecycle of lock: ================== First transaction is added to inode->owners list and an inodelk will be sent on the wire. All the next transactions will be put in inode->waiters list until the first transaction completes inodelk and [f]xattrop completely. Once [f]xattrop also completes, all the requests in the inode->waiters list are checked if it conflict with any of the existing locks which are in inode->owners list and if not are added to inode->owners list and resumed with doing transaction. When these transactions complete fop phase they will be moved to inode->post_op list and resume the transactions that were paused because of conflicts. Post-op and unlock will not be issued on the wire until that is the last transaction on that inode. Last transaction when it has to perform post-op can choose to sleep for deyed-post-op-secs value. During that time if any other transaction comes, it will wake up the sleeping transaction and takes over the ownership of the lock and the cycle continues. If the dealyed-post-op-secs expire, then the timer thread will wakeup the sleeping transaction and it will set lock->release to true and starts doing post-op and then unlock. During this time if any other transactions come, they will be put in inode->frozen list. Once the previous unlock comes it will move the frozen list to waiters list and moves the first element from this waiters-list to owners-list and attempts the lock and the cycle continues. This is the general idea. There is logic at the time of dealying and at the time of new transaction or in flush fop to wakeup existing sleeping transactions or choosing whether to delay a transaction etc, which is subjected to change based on future enhancements etc. Fixes: #418 BUG: 1549606 Change-Id: I88b570bbcf332a27c82d2767dfa82472f60055dc Signed-off-by: Pranith Kumar K <pkarampu@redhat.com>