glusterfs.git/tests/bugs/bug-1085330.t, branch v6.2

tests: move all test-cases into component subdirectories

2015-01-06T11:24:24+00:00

There are around 300 regression tests, 250 being in tests/bugs. Running
partial set of tests/bugs is not easy because this is a flat directory
with almost all tests inside.

It would be valuable to make partial test/bugs easier, and allow the use
of mulitple build hosts for a single commit, each running a subset of
the tests for a quicker result.

Additional changes made:
- correct the include path for *.rc shell libraries and *.py utils
- make the testcases pass checkpatch
- arequal-checksum in afr/self-heal.t was never executed, now it is
- include.rc now complains loudly if it fails to find env.rc

Change-Id: I26ffd067e9853d3be1fd63b2f37d8aa0fd1b4fea
BUG: 1178685
Reported-by: Emmanuel Dreyfus 
Reported-by: Atin Mukherjee 
URL: http://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-devel/2014-December/043414.html
Signed-off-by: Niels de Vos 
Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/9353
Reviewed-by: Kaleb KEITHLEY 
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Dreyfus 
Tested-by: Gluster Build System 
Reviewed-by: Vijay Bellur

glusterd : Volname, brickpath & volfpath length validation

2014-05-03T15:20:06+00:00

While creating a volume and adding a brick validation for _POSIX_PATH_MAX is
done on absolute pathname instead of relative pathname due to which a brickpath
having less than _POSIX_PATH_MAX may also fail the validation if the directory
length is greater than (_POSIX_PATH_MAX -strlen(brickpath/volume name).

Also this fix addresses one cli response message correction which says the
volume file is too long instead of brick path is too long (when brickpath
length validation doesn't fail and vol file length validation fails.)

It is also important to note that with the current design of volfile naming, it
can not be guranteed that volname and brickpath can have max of _POSIX_PATH_MAX
characters.

Change-Id: I1283d1f9dea96ae797620002c8723719f26a866d
BUG: 1085330
Signed-off-by: Atin Mukherjee 
Reviewed-on: http://review.gluster.org/7420
Reviewed-by: Niels de Vos 
Reviewed-by: Krishnan Parthasarathi 
Tested-by: Gluster Build System 
Reviewed-by: Vijay Bellur